This paper engages with the issues of intersubjectivity by raising three main questions about it: What is the status of the other and of the perspective of the other? How would a social ontology that starts from the other look like? and What is the relation between intersubjectivity and the possible? In addressing these questions, I propose four main approaches to self–other relations, each one focused on a different set of theories of intersubjectivity: cognitive (being self), pragmatist (becoming other), dialogical (becoming self), and allocentric (being other). Their main premises, processes, theories and proponents, as well as implications for ethics and the emergence of novelty, are reflected on in turn. Allocentrism emerges as a useful way to shift the focus from self to other in discussions of intersubjectivity, as an ontological condition of the possible, but also as a difficult position to adopt in practice, particularly in polarized societies.

中文翻译：

---

其他：主体间性，分配主义和可能

本文通过提出三个主要问题来解决主体间性问题：对方的地位如何以及对方的观点？从另一个开始的社会本体会是什么样子？主体间性与可能性之间有什么关系？在解决这些问题时，我提出了四种处理自我与他人关系的主要方法，每种方法都关注于一组不同的主体间性理论：认知（成为自我），实用主义者（成为他人），对话（成为自我）和同心论（成为自我）其他）。它们的主要前提，过程，理论和支持者，以及对伦理学和新颖性的产生的影响，都依次得到反映。在关于主体间性的讨论中，同心中心主义成为一种将注意力从自我转移到其他人的有用方法，