Paradox and dual‐process theories are used by management and organization researchers in studying a variety of phenomena across a wide range of management sub‐fields. Cognition is a focal point of both of these theories. However, despite their growing importance and shared areas of inquiry, these two theories have developed largely in isolation from each other. To address this lack of integration, the authors conducted a review and synthesis of relevant aspects of the paradox and dual‐process literatures. Focusing bidirectionally on how paradox theory informs dual‐process theory and how dual‐process theory informs paradox theory, they highlight the ‘nestedness’ of intuition and analysis in paradox (a paradox within paradoxical thinking). On the basis of the review and synthesis, they identify four themes (epistemological and ontological assumptions in the relationship between intuition and analysis; psychological and psychometric issues in the relationships between intuition and analysis; managers’ experiences of tensions between intuition and analysis; managers’ approaches to tensions between intuition and analysis) and introduce an integrative framework that assimilates these two perspectives and sets out an agenda for future research and implications for management.

中文翻译：

---

悖论与双重过程：综述与综述

管理和组织研究人员使用悖论和双重过程理论来研究广泛的管理子领域中的各种现象。认知是这两种理论的重点。然而，尽管它们的重要性和共同研究领域日益增长，但这两种理论在很大程度上彼此孤立地发展了。为了解决这种缺乏整合的问题，作者对悖论和双重过程文献的相关方面进行了回顾和综合。双向关注悖论理论如何指导双重过程理论以及双重过程理论如何指导悖论理论，他们强调了悖论（悖论思想中的悖论）的直觉和分析的“嵌套”。在审查和综合的基础上，