Unilateralism remains an opaque concept associated with discriminatory or coercive policy implications. Legal controversies about unilateralism have not prevented a continuing proliferation of unilateral trade measures in domestic fishery management regimes to deter illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. The widespread application of trade leverage requires a refined study of the confluence of multilateral trade and environmental governance frameworks on novel state activism. This article probes the long-running trajectory of the US Tuna and Shrimp disputes within the cross-institutional context of the World Trade Organization, multilateral environmental agreements and regional fisheries management organizations. It aims to shed new light on the nexus between unilateral trade measures and multilateral environmental agreements as an evolving and mutually adaptive process. Inspired is the critical thinking on elevating trade and environmental partnerships to coherently monitor and discipline trade unilateralism in its indirect role to ameliorate global environmental problems.

中文翻译：

---

单边贸易措施真的能促进多边环境协定吗？

单边主义仍然是一个与歧视性或强制性政策含义相关的不透明概念。关于单边主义的法律争议并没有阻止国内渔业管理制度中单边贸易措施的持续扩散，以阻止非法、未报告和无管制的捕捞活动。贸易杠杆的广泛应用需要对多边贸易和环境治理框架对新型国家激进主义的影响进行精细研究。本文在世界贸易组织、多边环境协定和区域渔业管理组织的跨机构背景下探讨了美国金枪鱼和虾争端的长期轨迹。它旨在阐明单边贸易措施与多边环境协定之间的关系作为一个不断发展和相互适应的过程。受到启发的是关于提升贸易和环境伙伴关系的批判性思维，以连贯地监督和约束贸易单边主义在改善全球环境问题方面的间接作用。