当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Journal of Special Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Systematic Review of Replicative Self-Determination Intervention Studies
The Journal of Special Education ( IF 1.968 ) Pub Date : 2019-06-14 , DOI: 10.1177/0022466919850188
John L. Luckner 1 , Rashida Banerjee 1 , Sara Movahedazarhouligh 1 , Kaitlyn Millen 1
Affiliation  

Current federal legislation emphasizes the use of programs, interventions, strategies, and activities that have been demonstrated through research to be effective. One way to increase the quantity and quality of research that guides practice is to conduct replication research. The purpose of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the replication research focused on self-determination conducted between 2007 and 2017. Using methods used by Cook and colleagues, we identified 80 intervention studies on topics related to self-determination, of which 31 were coded as replications. Intervention study trends, rate of replication studies, percentage of agreements between findings of original and replication studies, amount of author overlap, and types of research designs used are reported along with recommendations for future research.

中文翻译:

自我复制自我干预研究的系统评价

当前的联邦立法强调通过研究证明有效的方案,干预措施,策略和活动的使用。增加指导实践的研究的数量和质量的一种方法是进行复制研究。这项研究的目的是对2007年至2017年进行的针对自决的复制研究进行系统的综述。使用Cook和同事使用的方法,我们确定了80项与自决有关的干预研究。被编码为复制。报告了干预研究趋势,重复研究的比率,原始研究和重复研究的发现之间达成协议的百分比,作者重叠的数量以及所用研究设计的类型以及对未来研究的建议。
更新日期:2019-06-14
down
wechat
bug