The empirical focus of this paper is what looks like a verb third (V3) pattern in West Flemish (WF) in which an adverbial modifier (typically a temporal or conditional adjunct) is followed by a non-inverted subject-initial verb second (V2) root clause. This pattern will be referred to as the non-inverted V3 pattern. This paper has two goals. The first and major aim is to document the WF non-inverted V3 pattern, detailing both its syntactic and its semantic properties, in order to make these data available to the research community at large. We also develop an analysis in line with the hypothesis, substantiated in the paper, that WF is a genuine V2 language and that the apparent V3 data in do not jeopardise this assumption. The core hypothesis is that the initial adjunct in V3 patterns is extra-sentential or ‘main clause-external’ (cf. Broekhuis and Corver in Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and verb phrases. Volume 3: Chapter 14: main clause-external elements, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2016. http://www.oapen.org/), and that it combines with a full-fledged V2 clause by virtue of a discourse-structure (cf. Auer in Pragmatics 6:295–322, 1996). That the non-inverted V3 pattern is not acceptable in all varieties of Dutch is accounted for in terms of microvariation in the syntactic derivation of subject-initial V2 sentences.

中文翻译：

---

West Flemish V3 与句法与话语的互动

本文的实证重点是西弗拉芒语 (WF) 中的动词第三 (V3) 模式，其中状语修饰符（通常是时间或条件助词）后跟非倒装主语词首动词第二 (V2) ) 根子句。这种模式将被称为非倒置 V3 模式。本文有两个目标。第一个也是主要的目标是记录 WF 非倒置 V3 模式，详细说明其句法和语义属性，以便将这些数据提供给整个研究社区。我们还根据论文中证实的假设进行了分析，即 WF 是真正的 V2 语言，并且明显的 V3 数据不会危及这一假设。核心假设是 V3 模式中的初始助词是句外的或“主句外的”（参见 Broekhuis 和 Corver 的荷兰语语法。动词和动词短语。第 3 卷：第 14 章：主要条款 - 外部要素，阿姆斯特丹大学出版社，阿姆斯特丹，2016 年。http://www.oapen.org/），并且它凭借话语结构与成熟的 V2 条款相结合（参见 Auer in Pragmatics 6:295-322, 1996）。非倒转 V3 模式在所有荷兰语变体中都不能接受，这是根据主语首字母 V2 句子句法推导的微变化来解释的。