Technology roadmapping is one of the most popular and common strategic planning tools. Nevertheless, the process of developing a roadmap, which is as important as its outputs, is less widely considered. To improve the process, numerous international companies, organizations and institutions have published elaborate guidelines. This paper concentrates on the implementation of a novel participatory action research methodology for an Iranian organization with the aim of improving the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / International Energy Agency (OECD/IEA) (2014) model published as a guideline for developing a technology roadmap. The inquiry entails of three iterative cycles each of which consists of five steps: cognition, planning, action, evaluation and learning. Two types of learnings are achieved: firstly, to develop a technology roadmap for regenerative medicine, secondly, to improve the existing theory on the process of developing a technology roadmap. As a result, the following three conclusions can be drawn: First, interactional iterative meetings for more familiarization of the researcher and the experts with the subject are recommended. Second, in-depth semi-structured interviews are advised as the most effective data collecting method, third, multi-step evaluations and modifications shall be promoted to enhance and develop the content quality of the technology roadmap.

技术路线图是最流行和最常见的战略规划工具之一。然而，制定路线图的过程与其产出同样重要，但并未得到广泛考虑。为了改进这一过程，许多国际公司、组织和机构都发布了详细的指导方针。本文重点介绍伊朗组织实施一种新颖的参与式行动研究方法，目的是改进经济合作与发展组织 / 国际能源署 (OECD/IEA) (2014) 发布的模型，作为发展的指导方针。技术路线图。探究需要三个迭代循环，每个循环包含五个步骤：认知、计划、行动、评估和学习。实现了两种类型的学习：首先，制定再生医学的技术路线图，其次，改进现有的关于制定技术路线图过程的理论。因此，可以得出以下三个结论：首先，建议进行交互迭代会议，以便让研究人员和专家更熟悉该主题。二是建议采用深度半结构化访谈作为最有效的数据收集方式；三是推进多步评估和修改，提升和发展技术路线图的内容质量。建议举行互动迭代会议，以便让研究人员和专家更熟悉该主题。二是建议采用深度半结构化访谈作为最有效的数据收集方式；三是推进多步评估和修改，提升和发展技术路线图的内容质量。建议举行互动迭代会议，以便让研究人员和专家更熟悉该主题。二是建议采用深度半结构化访谈作为最有效的数据收集方式；三是推进多步评估和修改，提升和发展技术路线图的内容质量。