ABSTRACT

Although speakers in conversation have ways to indicate which one of their recipients ought to speak next, who actually comes to speak next is not an automatic result. There are circumstances in which a participant other than the addressed recipient of a sequence-initiating action speaks next. Here, practices aimed at allocating turns at talk form a local, moment-to-moment normative sequential environment for other-than-addressed participant intervention. Other participants can intervene: to implement the implicated sequence-responding action, to intercede on behalf of the addressed recipient by blocking the continued relevance of a response, or to interject a supplemental action that expands the sequence before a response is produced. These sequence-organizational practices both underpin and expose such culturally prescribed grounds for intervention as personal entitlement, social obligation, and group solidarity among others. Data (happen to be) in several varieties of English found in the United States.

摘要

尽管对话中的说话者可以通过多种方式指出接下来的哪个接收者应该说话，但谁真正要说话才是自动的结果。在某些情况下，除了序列发起操作的收件人之外，其他参与者接下来讲话。在这里，旨在为谈话分配轮流的做法形成了一个局部的，时刻到时刻的规范性顺序环境，用于未解决的参与者干预。其他与会者可以进行干预：以实现牵连序列响应行动，说情代表寻址的接收方的通过阻断反应的持续相关性，或插在产生反应之前扩展序列的补充作用。这些顺序组织的实践既支撑又暴露了文化规定的干预基础，例如个人权利，社会义务和群体团结等。在美国发现的几种英语数据（可能是）。