当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What Is the Best Way to Realise Rights?†
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies ( IF 1.443 ) Pub Date : 2019-01-01 , DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqz004 Ioanna Tourkochoriti
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies ( IF 1.443 ) Pub Date : 2019-01-01 , DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqz004 Ioanna Tourkochoriti
What is the best way to conceptualise the relation between the common good and rights? Is it courts or legislatures that protect rights most effectively? In their well-written and well-argued book, Legislated Rights: Securing Human Rights through Legislation, Gregoire Webber, Paul Yowell, Richard Ekins, Maris Kopcke, Bradley W Miller and Francisco J Urbina try to respond to these challenging questions. This article discusses critically some of the theses defended in the book. It aims to enhance some of their insights and bring nuances to some others. It suggests that a metaphor that can capture the process towards realising rights is the one of ‘collaboration’ among various government institutions. The right collaboration between the legislature and courts can help uncover the substantive meaning of the ‘general will’ that is so important towards realising rights. Engaging with works such as Legislated Rights allows the reader to form her own reflections on the proper articulations between rights and the common good.
中文翻译:
实现权利的最佳方式是什么?†
将共同利益与权利之间的关系概念化的最佳方式是什么?是法院还是立法机构最有效地保护权利?Gregoire Webber、Paul Yowell、Richard Ekins、Maris Kopcke、Bradley W Miller 和 Francisco J Urbina 在他们写得很好且论证充分的著作《立法权利:通过立法保障人权》中试图回答这些具有挑战性的问题。本文批判性地讨论了本书所捍卫的一些论点。它旨在增强他们的一些见解,并为其他一些人带来细微差别。它表明,可以捕捉实现权利的过程的比喻是各种政府机构之间的“合作”。立法机关和法院之间的正确合作有助于揭示对实现权利非常重要的“公意”的实质含义。参与诸如《立法权利》之类的作品可以让读者对权利与公共利益之间的适当联系形成自己的反思。
更新日期:2019-01-01
中文翻译:
实现权利的最佳方式是什么?†
将共同利益与权利之间的关系概念化的最佳方式是什么?是法院还是立法机构最有效地保护权利?Gregoire Webber、Paul Yowell、Richard Ekins、Maris Kopcke、Bradley W Miller 和 Francisco J Urbina 在他们写得很好且论证充分的著作《立法权利:通过立法保障人权》中试图回答这些具有挑战性的问题。本文批判性地讨论了本书所捍卫的一些论点。它旨在增强他们的一些见解,并为其他一些人带来细微差别。它表明,可以捕捉实现权利的过程的比喻是各种政府机构之间的“合作”。立法机关和法院之间的正确合作有助于揭示对实现权利非常重要的“公意”的实质含义。参与诸如《立法权利》之类的作品可以让读者对权利与公共利益之间的适当联系形成自己的反思。