This article concerns two interrelated, persistent problems for privacy law. The first is the failure of academic scholarship to get adequately to grips with the meaning of privacy. The second is the apparent inability of the English judiciary to resolve the common law lacuna in respect of intrusion-type privacy violations. The two problems are related in that the former is a significant contributor to the latter. Mainstream scholarship has long insisted on pursuing the One True Meaning of privacy, thereby overlooking valid alternative conceptualisations and creating a melange of theories that provides little assistance to judges. However, by adopting a novel, triangulation-based approach to understanding privacy of the sort proposed herein, it is possible to locate points of consensus between these rival theories in respect of particular privacy-violating activities. This consensus can provide the certainty common law judges require for the elaboration of further doctrine in this field.

中文翻译：

---

隐私法中的三角入侵

本文涉及隐私法的两个相互关联且持续存在的问题。首先是学术奖学金未能充分掌握隐私的含义。第二个是英国司法机构显然无法解决普通法在侵犯隐私方面的空白。这两个问题是相关的，因为前者是后者的重要贡献者。长期以来，主流学术界一直坚持追求隐私的唯一真正含义，从而忽视了有效的替代概念，并创造了对法官几乎没有帮助的理论混合物。然而，通过采用一种新颖的、基于三角测量的方法来理解本文提出的那种隐私，就特定的隐私侵犯活动而言，可以找到这些对立理论之间的共识点。这种共识可以提供普通法法官在该领域阐述进一步学说所需的确定性。