当前位置: X-MOL 学术Organ. Psychol. Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Beyond positivism: Toward a pluralistic approach to studying “real” teams
Organizational Psychology Review ( IF 5.600 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-15 , DOI: 10.1177/2041386620915593
Kyi Phyu Nyein 1 , Jesse R. Caylor , Ngoc S. Duong , Trevor N. Fry , Jessica L. Wildman 2
Affiliation  

To conduct sound research on organizational teams while overcoming the difficulties inherent in studying teams in situ, it is essential for researchers to consider all possible methodologies at their disposal. However, in the science of teams, published research is primarily driven by a positivist paradigm and quantitative methodology. This research offers an important perspective but fails to capitalize on the wide array of paradigms and methodologies outside of this perspective. Accordingly, we advocate for a pluralistic approach to studying real-world teams that utilizes qualitative methodologies to complement and enhance quantitative findings. We summarize philosophical assumptions, research paradigms, and qualitative methodologies not commonly used in research on teams. We then highlight existing qualitative research within several exemplar topic areas (team conflict, membership change, team adaptation, shared leadership, and inclusion in teams) and offer propositions for how qualitative methodologies can be used to develop a better understanding of real teams in organizations.



中文翻译:

超越实证主义:研究研究“真实”团队的多元化方法

为了对组织团队进行合理的研究,同时克服就地研究团队固有的困难,对于研究人员来说,考虑所有可用的方法至关重要。但是,在团队科学中,已发表的研究主要是由实证主义范式和定量方法论驱动的。这项研究提供了重要的观点,但未能利用该观点之外的广泛范式和方法论。因此,我们提倡采用多元方法研究现实世界的团队,该方法利用定性方法来补充和增强定量结果。我们总结了团队研究中不常用的哲学假设,研究范式和定性方法。

更新日期:2020-04-15
down
wechat
bug