The European Convention on Human Rights (‘Convention’) provides that the Committee of Ministers shall supervise the execution of the European Court of Human Rights’ (‘Court’) judgments. This article aims to address the question whether, despite what the Convention provides, the Court is involved in supervising the execution of its judgments. Additionally, this article addresses the question what the Court does when it is engaged in this exercise. In order to answer these two questions, four aspects of the Court's practice that are linked to the execution process are examined. These are the four aspects of interest: just-satisfaction judgments under Article 41 ECHR, follow-up cases concerning individual measures, follow-up cases concerning general measures and the pilot-judgment procedure. The analysis of these aspects will lead to the conclusion that the Court indeed engages in supervising execution, but also that this does not mean that the Court is taking on the Committee's task and that supervising execution has not become in any way part of the Court's day-to-day work.

中文翻译：

---

欧洲人权法院监督其判决的执行

《欧洲人权公约》（“公约”）规定，部长委员会应监督欧洲人权法院（“法院”）判决的执行。本文旨在解决尽管公约有规定，法院是否参与监督其判决的执行的问题。此外，本文还讨论了法院在进行这项工作时会做什么的问题。为了回答这两个问题，我们考察了与执行过程相关的法院实践的四个方面。这些是四个方面的利益：根据欧洲人权法院第 41 条的公正满意度判断、关于个别措施的后续案件、关于一般措施的后续案件和试点判断程序。