Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-17 , DOI: 10.1080/1091367x.2020.1822363 Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín 1 , Josep C. Benítez-Martínez 1 , Lorenzo Castillo-Ballesta 1 , Mariano Gacto-Sánchez 2 , Francesc Medina-Mirapeix 3
ABSTRACT
Many professionals use the handheld dynamometers (HHDs) to assess isometric strength. This study aimed to evaluate the validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of a DiCI (a new HHD) for the strength measurement of knee and hip muscles and their ratios. Thirty-five recreational athletes completed quadriceps, hamstring, and hip adductors and abductors strength tests in two identical sessions with 1-week interval between them. A fatigue test was carried out for the quadriceps and hamstring. Consistency between DiCI and MicroFet2 was excellent (r > 0.939) for all strength tests. Relative reliability analysis showed good to excellent ICCs (ICC’s isolated muscle range = 0.93 to 0.96 and ICC’s ratios range = 0.70 to 0.82). Sensitivity to change showed large change magnitudes for quadriceps and hamstring fatigue (−1.89 and −1.26, respectively). DiCI is valid and reliable to assess knee and hip strength and sensitive to fatigue change.
中文翻译:
膝关节和髋部肌肉力量测量的DiCI有效性,可靠性和敏感性
摘要
许多专业人员使用手持式测功机(HHD)来评估等距强度。这项研究旨在评估DiCI(一种新的HHD)对膝部和髋部肌肉及其比率的强度测量的有效性,可靠性和敏感性。35名休闲运动员在两次相同的训练中完成了股四头肌,绳肌,髋关节内收肌和外展肌的力量测试,每两次间隔1周。对股四头肌和腿筋进行了疲劳测试。在所有强度测试中,DiCI和MicroFet2之间的一致性非常好(r> 0.939)。相对可靠性分析显示出良好的ICC(优秀的ICC)(ICC的孤立肌肉范围为0.93至0.96,ICC的比率范围为0.70至0.82)。股四头肌和绳肌疲劳的变化敏感性表现出较大的变化幅度(分别为-1.89和-1.26)。