The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) follows its own rules regarding the responsibility of states, although the international law of state responsibility enshrined in the International Law Commission (ILC) Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA) remains, as general international law, relevant to its decisions. However, case law of the ECtHR shows that the Court is departing from certain ARSIWA principles as it adopts a broad interpretation of rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) giving rise to positive obligations.1Exploring those trends in the state responsibility regime of the ECHR, this article argues that, by clarifying certain ARSIWA provisions, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) can play an important role by contributing to a higher degree of judicial integration on the law of state responsibility. It is desirable that the ICJ takes any upcoming opportunity to provide greater clarity on the challenges and nuances of the applicability of the law of state responsibility, in particular as it relates to positive obligations. That would contribute to a more systematic use of those rules by regional courts such as the ECtHR, and ultimately to guaranteeing a greater protection of human rights.

中文翻译：

---

欧洲人权法院的国家责任和积极义务：国际法院在推进司法一体化方面的贡献

欧洲人权法院 (ECtHR) 遵循自己的关于国家责任的规则，尽管国际法委员会 (ILC) 关于国际不法行为的国家责任条款 (ARSIWA) 中所载的国家责任国际法仍然是一般性的国际法，与其决定有关。然而，欧洲人权法院的判例法表明，法院背离了某些 ARSIWA 原则，因为它采用了对《欧洲人权公约》（ECHR）所载权利的广泛解释，从而产生了积极的义务。1本文探讨了 ECHR 国家责任制度中的这些趋势，认为通过澄清 ARSIWA 的某些规定，国际法院（ICJ）可以发挥重要作用，促进更高程度的国家法司法整合责任。国际法院希望利用任何即将到来的机会，更清楚地说明国家责任法适用的挑战和细微差别，特别是在涉及积极义务时。这将有助于欧洲人权法院等地区法院更系统地使用这些规则，并最终保证对人权的更大保护。