The article addresses the relationship between judicial autonomy and the autonomy of the parties principles. The issue is not addressed so much through the lens of the procedural rules on the conduct of the proceedings, as through the prism of the general principles of adjudication which dictate the boundaries of judicial, or arbitral, decision-making. The focus will be on the combination between the principles ne, ultra and infra, petita and non liquet as they flow from the consensual nature of international adjudication and arbitration, on the one hand, and the principle jura novit curia which mirrors the autonomy of the judicial function, on the other. The analysis does not draw from national legal systems, nor from commercial arbitration. Due to the significantly different configuration of the principles at issue in different jurisdictions, it will focus on international litigation as an autonomous phenomenon. It will address firstly inter-state adjudication and then international investment arbitration. Special attention will be given to the ICSID system in consideration of its unique annulment mechanism. The article draws from researched case law an encouragement, if not simply the need, for international adjudicative bodies to undertake a proactive attitude in the conduct of the proceedings. More generally potentials emerge from the analysis, to the effect that not only inter-state adjudication may impact on investor-state arbitration, but also vice versa.

中文翻译：

---

关于国际裁决中的司法自治和当事人的自治，特别是投资仲裁和 ICSID 撤销程序

文章论述了司法自治与当事人意思自治原则之间的关系。这个问题不是通过关于程序进行的程序规则的视角来解决的，而是通过规定司法或仲裁决策边界的一般裁决原则的棱镜来解决的。重点将放在原则之间的结合上氖,极端主义者和基础设施,佩蒂塔和不液化因为它们一方面源于国际裁决和仲裁的协商一致性质，另一方面是原则汝拉新教廷另一方面，这反映了司法职能的自主性。该分析没有来自国家法律制度，也没有来自商业仲裁。由于不同司法管辖区的争议原则的配置存在显着差异，因此将重点关注国际诉讼作为一种自主现象。它将首先解决国家间裁决，然后是国际投资仲裁。考虑到其独特的废止机制，将特别关注 ICSID 系统。这篇文章从研究过的判例法中汲取了鼓励，如果不仅仅是需要，国际审判机构在诉讼程序中采取积极主动的态度。更普遍地，潜力从分析中出现，反之亦然.