当前位置: X-MOL 学术Law Philos. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Hart, Radbruch and the Necessary Connection Between Law and Morals
Law and Philosophy ( IF 0.526 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-17 , DOI: 10.1007/s10982-020-09382-7
J. G. Moore

Legal positivism maintains a distinction between law as it is and law as it ought to be. In other words, for positivists, a law can be legally valid even if it is immoral. H. L. A. Hart hoped to defend legal positivism against natural law. This paper analyses Hart’s criticism of Gustav Radbruch, a natural lawyer, before suggesting that Hart’s account of legal positivism gives rise to a logical problem. It is concluded that this problem leaves logical space for a theory of natural law based on moral authority rather than legal validity .

中文翻译:

Hart、Radbruch 以及法律与道德之间的必要联系

法律实证主义坚持区分法律的现状和法律的应有性。换句话说,对于实证主义者来说,法律即使是不道德的,也可以具有法律效力。HLA Hart 希望为反对自然法的法律实证主义辩护。本文分析了哈特对自然律师古斯塔夫·拉德布鲁赫 (Gustav Radbruch) 的批评,然后指出哈特对法律实证主义的解释引发了一个逻辑问题。得出的结论是,这个问题为基于道德权威而非法律效力的自然法理论留下了逻辑空间。
更新日期:2020-05-17
down
wechat
bug