当前位置: X-MOL 学术Language Learning and Development › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Statistical Learning in the Visuomotor Domain and Its Relation to Grammatical Proficiency in Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder: A Conceptual Replication and Meta-Analysis
Language Learning and Development ( IF 1.480 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-24 , DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2020.1820340
Imme Lammertink 1 , Paul Boersma 1 , Frank Wijnen 2 , Judith Rispens 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) have difficulties acquiring the grammatical rules of their native language. It has been proposed that children’s detection of sequential statistical patterns correlates with grammatical proficiency and hence that a deficit in the detection of these regularities may underlie the difficulties with grammar observed in children with DLD. Although there is some empirical evidence supporting this claim, individual studies, both in children with and without DLD, vary in the strength of their reported associations. The aim of the present study is therefore to evaluate the evidence for the proposed association. This is achieved by means of (a) a conceptual replication study on 35 children with DLD and 35 typically developing children who performed the serial reaction time task and a test of grammatical proficiency and (b) a meta-analysis over 19 unique effect sizes, which collectively examined the serial reaction time task – expressive grammar correlation in 139 children with DLD and 573 typically developing children. Both outcomes provide no evidence for or against the existence of the proposed association. Neither do they provide evidence for a difference in the strength of the association between both groups of children.



中文翻译:

视运动领域的统计学习及其与有无发展性语言障碍儿童的语法能力的关系:概念复制和Meta分析

摘要

患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童很难掌握其母语的语法规则。已经提出,儿童顺序统计模式的检测与语法水平相关,因此,检测这些规律性的缺陷可能是在DLD儿童中观察到的语法困难的基础。尽管有一些经验证据支持这种说法,但无论有无DLD儿童,个别研究的报道强度都有所不同。因此,本研究的目的是评估提议的关联的证据。这是通过(a)对35名DLD儿童和35名典型发育儿童执行的概念性复制研究来完成的,这些儿童执行了连续反应时间任务并进行了语法能力测试,并且(b)对19种独特效应大小进行了荟萃分析,他们共同研究了连续反应时间任务-139名DLD儿童和573名典型发育儿童的表达语法相关性。两种结果都没有提供证据支持或反对提议的协会的存在。他们也没有提供证据说明两组儿童之间的关联强度存在差异。两种结果都没有提供证据支持或反对提议的协会的存在。他们也没有提供证据说明两组儿童之间的关联强度存在差异。两种结果都没有提供证据支持或反对提议的协会的存在。他们也没有提供证据说明两组儿童之间的关联强度存在差异。

更新日期:2020-09-24
down
wechat
bug