Several studies found cross-linguistic structural priming with various language combinations. Here, we investigated the role of two important domains of language variation: case marking and word order, for transitive and ditransitive structures. We varied these features in an artificial language learning paradigm, using three different artificial language versions in a between-subjects design. Priming was assessed between Dutch (no overt case marking, SVO word order) and a) an SVO order version, b) a case marking version, and c) an SOV order version. Similar within-language and cross-linguistic priming was found in all versions for transitives, indicating that cross-linguistic structural priming was not hindered. In contrast, for ditransitives we found similar within-language priming for all versions, but no cross-linguistic priming. The finding that cross-linguistic priming is possible between languages that vary in morphological marking or word order, is compatible with studies showing cross-linguistic priming between natural languages that differ on these dimensions.

中文翻译：

---

案例标记和词序在晚二语习得中跨语言结构启动中的作用

几项研究发现了各种语言组合的跨语言结构启动。在这里，我们研究了语言变异的两个重要领域的作用：案例标记和词序，用于传递和双传递结构。我们在人工语言学习范式中改变了这些特征，在主体间设计中使用了三种不同的人工语言版本。在荷兰语（无明显案例标记，SVO 词序）和 a) SVO 命令版本，b) 案例标记版本和 c) SOV 命令版本之间评估启动。在所有传递物版本中都发现了类似的语言内和跨语言启动，这表明跨语言结构启动没有受到阻碍。相比之下，对于双及物语，我们发现所有版本都有相似的语言内启动，但没有跨语言启动。