The integrated model of advice giving (IMA) proposes that advising in supportive interactions should be carried out in three sequential moves: emotional support—problem inquiry and analysis—advice (EPA). Prior research indicates the utility of this framework for effective advising in supportive interactions. The current project proposed and tested an extended integrated model of advice giving, adding eSteem support (S) as a fourth move in the sequence. Two experiments were conducted. Study 1 included 371 participants recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Results showed that the emotional support—problem inquiry and analysis—advice—eSteem support (EPAS) sequence did not elicit significantly higher evaluations of advice quality compared with the EPA or emotional support—problem inquiry and analysis—eSteem support—advice (EPSA) sequence. Study 2 replicated Study 1 with 364 college students and found that, compared with the other two sequences, the EPAS sequence did not produce significantly higher evaluations of advice quality or intention to follow advice. Theoretical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

充满鼓励的建议：对支持性互动中提供建议的扩展综合模型的初步评估

提供建议的综合模型 (IMA) 提出，支持性互动中的建议应按三个顺序进行：情感支持——问题探究和分析——建议 (EPA)。先前的研究表明该框架可用于在支持性互动中提供有效建议。当前项目提出并测试了一个扩展的综合建议模型，添加了 eSteem 支持 (S) 作为序列中的第四步。进行了两个实验。研究 1 包括从 Amazon Mechanical Turk 招募的 371 名参与者。结果表明，情感支持——问题查询和分析——建议——eSteem 支持 (EPAS) 序列与 EPA 或情感支持——问题查询和分析——eSteem 支持——建议 (EPSA) 序列相比，并未引起显着更高的建议质量评估. 研究 2 对 364 名大学生重复了研究 1，发现与其他两个序列相比，EPAS 序列对建议质量或遵循建议的意愿没有产生显着更高的评价。讨论了未来研究的理论意义和方向。