当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Economic Issues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Veblen and Bourdieu on Social Reality and Order: Individuals and Institutions
Journal of Economic Issues ( IF 0.854 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-02 , DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2020.1794457
Theofanis Papageorgiou , Panayotis G. Michaelides , Dieter Bögenhold

Abstract: This essay focuses on the conceptual relationship between Veblen and Bourdieu given that several important aspects of their works remain less widely discussed, or even inadequately explored in a comparative manner. First, the two scholars have laid the foundations of a socioeconomic perspective. Evolution and change are the fundamental vehicles of economic life in their respective works. In such a framework, a central point of their analyses is the interdependence between the cultural, social, and economic spheres. Furthermore, an economic sociology is built around the concept of habit formation. Systemic views expressed, focus on the various institutions and other aspects of cultural, social and economic life, where habits are formed and cover diverse fields and notions such as Rationality, Individualism, Institutions, Classes, Power, Struggle, Culture, and even Capitalism. For instance, both acknowledged that society is a field for the exercise of power, where antagonisms emerge giving way to negotiation, struggle, and compromise. Also, both recognized that research and knowledge development is a collective social process. However, from a methodological perspective, their main emphasis is on the emerging dynamic evolution of habits, which is perceived as the interruption of already existing social norms and the conflict between routine and change.

中文翻译:

凡勃伦和布迪厄论社会现实与秩序:个人与制度

摘要:本文重点讨论凡勃伦和布迪厄之间的概念关系,因为他们作品的几个重要方面仍未得到广泛讨论,甚至没有以比较的方式进行充分探讨。首先,两位学者奠定了社会经济视角的基础。进化和变化是他们各自作品中经济生活的基本载体。在这样的框架中,他们分析的一个中心点是文化、社会和经济领域之间的相互依存关系。此外,经济社会学是围绕习惯形成的概念建立的。表达的系统观点,侧重于文化、社会和经济生活的各种制度和其他方面,在这些方面形成习惯,涵盖不同领域和概念,如理性、个人主义、制度、阶级、权力、斗争、文化,甚至资本主义。例如,两人都承认社会是一个行使权力的领域,在那里出现对抗,让位于谈判、斗争和妥协。此外,双方都认识到研究和知识发展是一个集体的社会过程。然而,从方法论的角度来看,他们的主要重点是习惯的新兴动态演变,这被视为对现有社会规范的中断以及常规与变化之间的冲突。
更新日期:2020-07-02
down
wechat
bug