Modern constitutions play, to a larger or lesser extent, several simultaneous political functions, including the definition of a rights-based political order, the organization of state powers, and the crafting of the nation. Feminist analysis of constitutional law has so far primarily focused on the denial or limitation of an equal rights status to women since the inception of constitutions. More recently, it has also challenged the gender composition of state institutions as well as the gendered implications of the various forms of government and power structures. In times of worldwide expanding nationalism, serious reflection on the many ways in which nationalism has always been, and still is, a gendered enterprise is called for. Relying on the categories identified in the work of Yuval-Davis, this article distinguishes between nationalist ideologies that focus on the definition of citizenship in specific states and territories (the “Staatnation”), those that place an emphasis on specific cultures or religions (the “Kulturnation”), and those that are constructed around the specific origin of the people and its continuation into the future (the “Volknation”). This article also shows, relying on the example of several contemporary constitutional struggles across the world, how these three dimensions of nationalism often continue to deny equal constitutional citizenship to women and sexual minorities.

中文翻译：

---

性别民族主义和宪政主义

现代宪法或多或少地同时发挥着几种政治功能，包括定义基于权利的政治秩序、组织国家权力和塑造国家。迄今为止，女权主义对宪法的分析主要集中在自宪法诞生以来对妇女平等权利地位的否定或限制。最近，它还挑战了国家机构的性别构成以及各种形式的政府和权力结构的性别影响。在世界范围内扩大民族主义的时代，需要认真反思民族主义一直是，而且仍然是性别化企业的多种方式。依靠 Yuval-Davis 工作中确定的类别，本文区分了侧重于特定州和领土（“Staatnation”）中的公民身份定义的民族主义意识形态、强调特定文化或宗教的民族主义意识形态（“Kulturnation”），以及围绕特定国家和地区构建的民族主义意识形态。人的起源及其对未来的延续（“Volknation”）。本文还以世界各地的几场当代宪法斗争为例，展示了民族主义的这三个方面如何经常继续否认妇女和性少数群体享有平等的宪法公民权。以及那些围绕人的特定起源及其对未来的延续（“Volknation”）而构建的。本文还以世界各地的几场当代宪法斗争为例，展示了民族主义的这三个方面如何经常继续否认妇女和性少数群体享有平等的宪法公民权。以及那些围绕人的特定起源及其对未来的延续（“Volknation”）而构建的。本文还以世界各地的几场当代宪法斗争为例，展示了民族主义的这三个方面如何经常继续否认妇女和性少数群体享有平等的宪法公民权。