In this brief squib, I take up the first of the provocations put forward by Wise and Schwarz in their recent article and make an attempt to spark further discussion. Specifically, I argue that instead of attempting to agree on an overarching, unified conceptual framework for CSCL from the top down, and rather than synthesizing findings from CSCL research from the bottom up, we could take a taxonomy of CSCL support dimensions as a starting point and engage in a concerted research effort with the aim of working towards a comprehensive framework of CSCL support. I therefore propose such a taxonomy, which currently comprises 12 dimensions. By referring to some of my own research, I demonstrate how the proposed process of providing evidence-based design principles for CSCL support that cut across and interleave the dimensions of the taxonomy could work.

中文翻译：

---

一个框架来统治所有人？进行Wise和Schwarz发起的对话

在这篇简短的引文中，我讨论了Wise和Schwarz在他们最近的文章中提出的第一个挑衅，并试图引发进一步的讨论。具体来说，我认为，与其试图从上至下地商定CSCL的总体，统一的概念框架，还不如从下至上综合CSCL研究的结果，我们可以将CSCL支持维度的分类法作为起点并致力于协调研究工作，以期建立CSCL支持的综合框架。因此，我提出了这样一种分类法，目前包括12个维度。通过参考我自己的一些研究，我演示了为CSCL支持提供基于证据的设计原则的建议过程，该过程跨越并且交错了分类法的各个维度。