Introduction: the right to be forgotten entailed several legal uncertainties at inception The ‘right to be forgotten’ (RTBF), or more precisely the ‘right to suppression’ continues its judicial saga as it is being examined by the very same Court that created it, following the submission of 11 preliminary questions by the French Council of State before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Created by the CJEU in its Google Spain judgment on 13 May 2014, the right to be deindexed has been seen as ‘triply audacious’ with regard to its legal implications. First, it includes in the territorial scope of Directive 95/46 the search engine activity performed by Google Inc. from the USA. To this end, the Court first established that, although it had only a technical role in the processing of the search engine’s data, Google Inc.’s Spanish subsidiary had a business of selling advertising spaces intended for the Spanish market in order to make the service offered by Google Inc. profitable. Key Points

中文翻译：

---

被遗忘权是一项普遍的、区域性的或“全球本地”的权利吗？

简介：被遗忘权一开始就涉及一些法律上的不确定性 “被遗忘权”（RTBF），或者更准确地说，“压制权”继续其司法传奇，因为它正在由创建它的同一个法院进行审查之后，法国国务委员会向欧盟法院 (CJEU) 提交了 11 个初步问题。由欧洲法院在其 2014 年 5 月 13 日的谷歌西班牙判决中创建，被取消索引的权利在其法律影响方面被视为“三重大胆”。首先，它将美国谷歌公司执行的搜索引擎活动包括在指令 95/46 的领土范围内。为此，法院首先确定，尽管 Google Inc. 在处理搜索引擎数据方面仅起技术作用，的西班牙子公司从事销售面向西班牙市场的广告空间的业务，以使 Google Inc. 提供的服务盈利。关键点