Changes to the UK constitutional and institutional settlement on Brexit day may affect the likelihood of the UK securing an adequacy decision under GDPR. Despite the UK Government claiming that on Brexit day, ‘it will have fully implemented EU [data] privacy rules’ it will have no equivalent of Article 8 of the EU Charter in domestic law. This may undermine efforts to achieve an adequacy ruling due to the decision of the CJEU in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner. The UK’s decision to continue with a data retention regime in Part 4 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 could also be at odds with the Article 8, Charter right. Conflict between the domestic legal settlement of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 and the decision of the CJEU in Tele2 Sverige AB v Post-och telestyrelsen may also imperil an adequacy decision.

中文翻译：

---

英国退欧后欧盟和英国之间的数据传输？

英国脱欧日对英国宪法和制度解决方案的更改可能会影响英国根据 GDPR 获得充分性决定的可能性。尽管英国政府声称在英国退欧当天，“它将完全实施欧盟 [数据] 隐私规则”，但在国内法中不会有与《欧盟宪章》第 8 条等效的条款。由于欧洲法院在马克西米利安施雷姆斯诉数据保护专员案中的决定，这可能会破坏实现充分性裁决的努力。英国决定在 2016 年《调查权力法》第 4 部分继续采用数据保留制度也可能与第 8 条“宪章权利”不一致。2016 年调查权力法的国内法律解决与欧洲法院在 Tele2 Sverige AB v Post-och Telestyrelsen 中的决定之间的冲突也可能危及充分性决定。