In this paper, we build on the longstanding issue of whether and to what extent scholarly research affects stakeholders outside academia and focus on the management and IS fields. We take a practice-based view and build theoretically on the concepts of sites of knowing and knowing in practice. We interviewed experienced practice scholars and reviewed key practice theorizing concepts to demonstrate that: 1) impact outside academia does happens but in ways that are not evident from published academic papers; and, 2) the practice-based view allows us to understand how impact occurs and offers effective strategies to enhance it. Yet, practice scholars' impact outside academia still holds substantial areas of improvement, which we identify theoretically and showcase with concrete examples leading to recommendations. The insights we propose are not directed only to practice scholars, though. They can assist scholars of all epistemological, methodological, and theoretical perspectives to enhance research impact and engage meaningfully with multiple stakeholders beyond academic boundaries.

在本文中，我们以学术研究是否影响学术界以外的利益相关者以及在多大程度上影响学术界以外的利益相关者这一长期问题为基础，并将重点放在管理和IS领域。我们采取基于实践的观点，并在理论上基于在实践中了解和认识的场所的概念。我们采访了经验丰富的实践学者并回顾了关键的实践理论概念，以证明：1）确实发生了学术界外部的影响，但是其影响方式在已发表的学术论文中并不明显；2）基于实践的观点使我们能够理解影响是如何发生的，并提供有效的策略来增强影响。但是，实践学者在学术界之外的影响仍然有很大的改进领域，我们从理论上加以确定，并通过具体实例进行展示，以提出建议。但是，我们提出的见解不仅针对实践学者。它们可以帮助所有认识论，方法论和理论观点的学者增强研究影响，并与学术界以外的多个利益相关者进行有意义的互动。