The European Court of Human Rights increasingly deals with migrants’ complaints about destitution in their host state under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment). This case law has been criticized for not being consistent and/or for not providing migrants with enough protection. Based on a systematic case law search, in this article, I analyse Article 3 case law on migrants’ destitution from a new perspective: the concept of freedom as non-domination, as developed in (neo) republican theory. It will argue that, seen through this lens, many tendencies in the Court’s case law can be explained and constructed as consistent, and it is submitted that in this way the Court does provide migrants with important protection against unfreedom. Nevertheless, I also argue in the article that the case law could be improved in a number of ways in order to provide more effective and robust protection against domination.

中文翻译：

---

不被支配的权利：欧洲人权法院关于移民贫困的判例法

根据《欧洲人权公约》第 3 条（禁止不人道和有辱人格的待遇），欧洲人权法院越来越多地处理移民对东道国贫困的投诉。该判例法因不一致和/或没有为移民提供足够的保护而受到批评。基于系统的判例法搜索，在本文中，我从一个新的角度分析了关于移民贫困的第 3 条判例法：在（新）共和主义理论中发展起来的作为非统治的自由概念。它会争辩说，从这个角度来看，法院判例法中的许多趋势可以被解释和构建为一致的，并且认为通过这种方式，法院确实为移民提供了重要的保护，使其免受不自由的侵害。尽管如此，