This article seeks to provide a comparative and up-to-date overview of the applicable rules and relevant practice of the European Court of Human Rights and of the United Nations Human Rights Committee on forum duplication in international human rights litigation. While specific inadmissibility clauses have been included in both the European Convention on Human Rights and the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with a view to preventing multiple human rights petitions in relation to the same matter, their respective scopes differ. Moreover, the applicable normative framework has led to important—and diverging—judicial developments in Strasbourg and in Geneva, which may be of great significance in human rights practice and therefore deserve to be thoroughly addressed.

中文翻译：

---

多项人权投诉的可受理性：斯特拉斯堡和日内瓦的比较

本文旨在对欧洲人权法院和联合国人权委员会在国际人权诉讼中的论坛重复问题的适用规则和相关实践进行比较和最新概述。虽然《欧洲人权公约》和《公民权利和政治权利国际公约任择议定书》都包含了具体的不可受理条款，以防止就同一事项提出多项人权申诉，但它们各自的范围有所不同。此外，适用的规范框架导致斯特拉斯堡和日内瓦出现了重要且不同的司法发展，这在人权实践中可能具有重要意义，因此值得彻底解决。