In the world of practice, we recognize the importance of providing meaningful or helpful feedback on individual performance. The same is true in the world of scholarship. How we advance our knowledge in the field of human resource development (HRD) depends on many things, among which is high-quality research. Our ability to provide constructive feedback on our fellow researchers’ scholarship is essential for us, not just as a reviewer but also as a writer. With good feedback, we are better positioned to make improvement. This editorial serves two purposes: (a) to provide an opportunity for scholars to engage in a deep and critical reflection on our own practice as a reviewer, and (b) to provide some guidelines for constructing an effective review. It is hoped that this editorial will provide you with a reference tool and, more importantly, prompt your actions toward self-improvement. In the reminder of this editorial, I will address three questions related to peer reviews: Why, What, and How.

中文翻译：

---

通过质量稿件审查来有所作为

在实践世界中，我们认识到针对个人绩效提供有意义或有用的反馈的重要性。在学术界也是如此。我们如何提高人力资源开发（HRD）领域的知识取决于很多事情，其中​​包括高质量的研究。我们对研究人员的奖学金提供建设性反馈的能力对我们至关重要，不仅是作为审稿人，还是作家。有了良好的反馈，我们就可以更好地进行改进。这篇社论有两个目的：（a）为学者提供一个机会，对我们自己作为审稿人的实践进行深刻而批判性的思考；（b）为构建有效的审稿提供一些指导。希望这篇社论能为您提供参考工具，更重要的是，提示您采取自我完善的行动。在此社论的提醒下，我将解决与同行评审相关的三个问题：为什么，什么和如何。