High Ability Studies ( IF 1.563 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-07 , DOI: 10.1080/13598139.2019.1598772 Albert Ziegler 1 , Heidrun Stoeger 2
ABSTRACT
Regulatory processes are pervasive on many levels in talent development, yet neither a systematic analysis of their role in talent development let alone a comprehensive model have been presented to date. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the diversity and complexity of regulatory processes in talent development and to provide a conceptual framework. The proposed nonagonal framework of regulation in talent development (NFRTD) distinguishes nine dimensions for the analysis of regulation in talent development: regulatory network (neutral, co-operative, competitive, hybrid, and panarchic), regulatory function (homeostasis and homeorhesis), control type (external, internal-automatic, and internal-controlled), regulatory type (open-loop control and closed-loop control), regulatory form (iterative and recursive), regulatory activities (preventive, detective, and corrective), regulated structures (exogenous and endogenous learning resources), regulatory side-effects (neutral, synergetic, destructive, catalytic, exploitative, and allostatic), and regulatory externalities (neutral, iatrogenic, and autocatalytic). The last section discusses the status of the nonagonal framework and hints at some fields of application.
中文翻译:
人才发展监管的非对角框架(NFRTD)
摘要
监管流程在人才发展的各个层面上都很普遍,但是迄今为止,都没有对监管流程在人才发展中的作用进行系统的分析,更不用说提供全面的模型了。本文的目的是演示人才开发过程中监管流程的多样性和复杂性,并提供一个概念框架。拟议的人才发展监管非对角框架(NFRTD)区分了九个方面的人才发展监管分析:监管网络(中性,合作,竞争,混合和泛滥),监管功能(稳态和同质性),控制类型(外部,内部自动和内部控制),监管类型(开环控制和闭环控制),监管形式(迭代和递归),监管活动(预防性,侦探性和矫正性),受监管的结构(外源和内源性学习资源),监管的副作用(中性,协同,破坏性,催化性,剥削性和同化性)以及监管外部性(中性,医源性和自催化性)。最后一部分讨论了非对角框架的状态,并提示了一些应用领域。