This review essay discusses some of the effects of the feminist methodologies utilised in Feminist Judgments in International Law (Hodson and Lavers (eds), Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2019), in which ‘feminist judges’ rewrote fifteen well-known international law cases. A glimpse is provided into aspects of the feminist judgments that were transformative, before turning to the contributors’ ‘Reflections’, which highlight some of the obstructions encountered and compromises made in the processes of judging. The collection makes a useful and compelling contribution to concretising feminist methods, in all their diversity, in international law, while teaching us a great deal about the limitations of the justice delivered by the legal form of judging.

中文翻译：

---

行动中的女权主义判断：反思国际法中的女权主义判断项目

这篇评论文章讨论了国际法中的女性主义判断（Hodson 和 Lavers（编辑），Hart Publishing，牛津，2019 年）中使用的女性主义方法论的一些影响，其中“女性主义法官”改写了 15 个著名的国际法案例。在转向贡献者的“反思”之前，先对具有变革性的女权主义判断的各个方面进行一瞥，该“反思”突出了在判断过程中遇到的一些障碍和做出的妥协。该系列对国际法中各种多样性的女权主义方法的具体化做出了有用且引人注目的贡献，同时让我们了解了法律审判形式所提供的正义的局限性。