Social Europe – Case law of the Court of Justice – ‘Real’ and ‘apparent’ displacement – Court’s interpretive task more complex and contested – Directives based on ‘flexicurity’ policy – Cases in which workers have competing interests, e.g. age discrimination – Viking and Laval – Re-framing of employers’ interests as fundamental rights under Article 16 EU Charter – Declining relevance of the Court in labour law – Challenges for EU labour lawyers

中文翻译：

---

法院如何改变其对社会法律的管理和方法？

社会欧洲 – 法院的判例法 – “真实的”和“明显的”流离失所 – 法院的解释任务更加复杂和有争议 – 基于“灵活保障”政策的指令 – 工人具有竞争利益的案例，例如年龄歧视 –维京人和拉瓦尔– 根据《欧盟宪章》第 16 条将雇主利益重新定义为基本权利 – 法院在劳动法中的相关性下降 – 欧盟劳工律师面临的挑战