Share contracts are the dominant remuneration system in artisanal fisheries. Introducing regulations based on collective use rights may affect the way profits are distributed. The literature on the effect of regulatory reform on factor income distribution, however, is scarce. In this paper, we look at differences in the implementation of the Extractive Artisanal Regime in Chilean hake artisanal fisheries to test its effect on share contracts. We estimated a switching regression model using census data to calculate the average treatment effect. Our results show that crewmembers in communities regulated by some form of collective use rights receive, on average, 6 per cent more of total net incomes compared to those regulated by a limited access with global quota regime. Differences in the relation between crew size and labor rewards, as well as in the negotiating power of crewmembers under different regimes, may explain the results.

中文翻译：

---

集体使用权对股份合同的影响：以智利无须鳕渔业的采掘手工制度 (RAE) 为例

股份合同是手工渔业的主要报酬制度。引入基于集体使用权的法规可能会影响利润分配的方式。然而，关于监管改革对要素收入分配影响的文献很少。在本文中，我们着眼于智利无须鳕手工渔业实施采掘手工制度的差异，以测试其对股份合同的影响。我们使用人口普查数据估计了一个转换回归模型，以计算平均治疗效果。我们的研究结果表明，与受全球配额制度限制进入的社区相比，受某种形式的集体使用权监管的社区中的船员获得的总净收入平均多出 6%。船员规模与劳动报酬关系的差异，