当前位置: X-MOL 学术Early Years › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Indigenous caregivers and indigeneity in Bogota: between two worlds
Early Years ( IF 1.069 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-06 , DOI: 10.1080/09575146.2020.1818060
Carmen Maria Sanchez Caro 1 , Pascale Garnier 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Recently, the government of Bogota (Colombia) has focused on improving Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) services in a way that considers diversity. The national policy and the political project for Bogota recognise ECEC services based on a positive discrimination approach. Among them there is an indigenous ECEC service, known as House of indigenous Knowledge (HIK), staffed by Indigenous professionals. Based on ethnographic research in three HIKs this article aims to study the legitimacy of indigenous caregivers (ICs) as early childhood professionals (ECP). Using the political sociological approach of Boltanski and Thévenot On Justification, the paper aims to analyse the professionalism of ICs in terms of competing ‘regimes of actions’. It shows the importance of ICs’ implicit cultural knowledge compared to the ‘western’ ECEC practitioners’ expertise. It sheds light on what IC practice ought to be: rooted in Indigenous traditions, while at the same time, acknowledging a ‘western’ vision of ECEC professionals’ practices.

中文翻译:

波哥大的土著照顾者和土著:两个世界之间

摘要 最近,波哥大(哥伦比亚)政府以考虑多样性的方式专注于改善幼儿教育和保育 (ECEC) 服务。波哥大的国家政策和政治项目承认基于积极歧视方法的 ECEC 服务。其中有一项土著 ECEC 服务,称为土著知识之家 (HIK),由土著专业人员组成。基于对三个 HIK 的人种学研究,本文旨在研究土著照顾者 (IC) 作为幼儿专业人员 (ECP) 的合法性。使用 Boltanski 和 Thévenot On Justification 的政治社会学方法,本文旨在从竞争性“行动制度”的角度分析 IC 的专业性。与“西方”ECEC 从业者的专业知识相比,它显示了 IC 的内隐文化知识的重要性。它阐明了 IC 实践应该是什么:植根于土著传统,同时承认 ECEC 专业人员实践的“西方”愿景。
更新日期:2020-09-06
down
wechat
bug