当前位置: X-MOL 学术Crit. Stud. Educ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The turn towards policy mobilities and the theoretical-methodological implications for policy sociology
Critical Studies in Education ( IF 3.626 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-14 , DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2020.1808499
Steven Lewis 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

This paper reflects critically upon how the ‘mobilities turn’ in the social sciences, and its subsequent contribution towards ‘policy mobilities’, offers theoretical and methodological resources that can be usefully harnessed in education policy sociology. Just as there are new ways in which policy is being made and moved, there are equally new ways to be a researcher of education policy who seeks to understand these processes. My purpose here is to help crystallise and make explicit these new mobilities-informed approaches, not only for the purpose of considering how mobility can help reconsider how to think and practise policy sociology, but also to better reflect and accommodate the empirical changes inherent in contemporary policymaking and enactment. I first survey the literature around the mobilities turn and emphasise its implications for social science research, before turning to how policy mobilities theories and methodologies can be employed within policy sociology. Finally, I close the paper by reflecting on the implications of conducting policy sociology with a policy mobility lens and outline the issues that come from foregrounding movement in the research of education policy.



中文翻译:

转向政策流动性和政策社会学的理论方法学意义

摘要

本文批判性地反思了社会科学中“流动性转向”的方式及其对“政策流动性”的后续贡献,提供了可在教育政策社会学中有效利用的理论和方法资源。正如有其政策正在取得搬到新的途径,也有同样的新方法试图了解这些过程的教育政策研究人员。我在这里的目的是帮助具体化和明确这些新的流动性知情方法,不仅是为了考虑流动性如何有助于重新思考如何思考和实践政策社会学,而且是为了更好地反映和适应当代固有的经验变化。政策制定和颁布。我首先调查了有关流动性转向的文献,并强调了它对社会科学研究的影响,然后再转向如何在政策社会学中使用政策流动性理论和方法。最后,我通过反思从政策流动的视角开展政策社会学的意义来结束这篇论文,并概述了教育政策研究中的前景运动所带来的问题。

更新日期:2020-08-14
down
wechat
bug