当前位置: X-MOL 学术Calif. Manag. Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
To Frame or Reframe: Where Might Design Thinking Research Go Next?
California Management Review ( IF 10.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-01 , DOI: 10.1177/0008125620906620
Sara L. Beckman 1
Affiliation  

Design thinking is gaining widespread attention in the practitioner and academic literature. Successful implementation has been documented, and its value shown in empirical studies. There is little examination, however, of how design thinking practices fit with other approaches from which firms might choose to frame and solve problems such as agile, lean startup, scientific method, Six Sigma, critical thinking, and systems thinking. By digging into the basic capabilities underlying design thinking, academic researchers might better understand problem framing and solving in general and provide insight for practitioners as to where alternative approaches might be applied.

中文翻译:

构架或重组:设计思维研究的下一步发展方向是什么?

设计思想正在从业者和学术文献中得到广泛关注。成功的实施已被记录在案,其价值在实证研究中得到了证明。然而,关于设计思维实践如何与其他方法相适应的研究很少,企业可以从中选择框架来解决和解决诸如敏捷,精益创业,科学方法,六西格码,批判性思维和系统思维等问题。通过深入研究设计思维的基本能力,学术研究人员可能会更好地理解问题的总体框架和解决方案,并为从业人员提供有关可在何处应用替代方法的见解。
更新日期:2020-02-01
down
wechat
bug