Abstract The article suggests that while there are differences between typical judicial justice procedures and the alternative dispute resolution procedures that may require a different application of principles, the core concept remains unchanged. The principles of judicial independence, impartiality, and the value of fairness apply to both with proper adjustments. The article also proposes that in view of the increase in online dispute resolution procedures (ODR), a new approach must be introduced to ensure fairness in online justice, following the model of impartiality and decisional independence that is now accepted for administrative adjudicators.

中文翻译：

---

非司法司法中公平和公正的义务

摘要 文章认为，虽然典型的司法司法程序与可能需要不同原则适用的替代性争议解决程序之间存在差异，但核心概念保持不变。司法独立、公正和公平价值的原则在适当调整后适用于两者。文章还提出，鉴于在线争议解决程序（ODR）的增加，必须按照行政审判员现在接受的公正和决策独立的模式，引入新的方法来确保在线司法的公平。