当前位置: X-MOL 学术Argumentation › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Underlying Assumptions of Examining Argumentation Rhetorically
Argumentation ( IF 1.172 ) Pub Date : 2019-10-11 , DOI: 10.1007/s10503-019-09501-2
David Zarefsky

Argumentation is the offspring of logic, dialectic, and rhetoric. Differences among them are matters more of degree than of kind, but each reflects basic underlying assumptions. This essay explicates five key assumptions of rhetorical approaches to argumentation: (1) audience assent is the ultimate measure of an argument’s success or failure; (2) argumentation takes place within a context of uncertainty, both about the subject of the dispute and about the process for conducting the dispute; (3) arguers function as restrained partisans and accept risks that follow from such a status; (4) despite its seemingly adversarial nature, argumentation is fundamentally cooperative, pursuing the shared goal of making the best decision; and (5) argumentation is grounded in the situational context of particular cases.

中文翻译:

从修辞角度检查论证的基本假设

论证是逻辑、辩证法和修辞学的产物。它们之间的差异更多是程度而非种类,但每个都反映了基本的潜在假设。这篇文章解释了修辞学论证方法的五个关键假设:(1)听众的同意是论证成功或失败的最终衡量标准;(2) 争论是在不确定的背景下进行的,无论是关于争议的主题还是进行争议的过程;(3) 主张者作为受约束的党派人士,接受这种地位所带来的风险;(4) 尽管看似对抗性,论证本质上是合作的,追求做出最佳决策的共同目标;(5) 论证基于特定案件的情境背景。
更新日期:2019-10-11
down
wechat
bug