This paper concerns the character of argumentation in inner dialogue, i.e. dialogue that an individual keeps to herself in her own mind. The problem of inner dialogue research is the methodological difficulty connected with its externalization. In the text, the activity of crisis diary-writing is suggested as a way of naturally externalizing inner decision-making. By adopting a pragma-dialectic approach to argumentation, the text attempts to characterize crisis diary-writing as an argumentative activity type. The argumentative characterization of crisis diary-writing involves identifying the institutional point and implemented genre as well as distinguishing the empirical counterparts of the four stages of critical discussion. For illustration, the paper draws its examples from Anne Frank’s Diary. As a result of the characterization achieved in the paper, it is concluded that crisis diary-writing is a conventionalized deliberative activity type preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.

中文翻译：

---

危机日记写作作为交际活动类型的语用辩证重构

本文关注的是内在对话中论证的性质，即一个人在自己的头脑中保持对自己的对话。内在对话研究的问题是与其外化相关的方法论困难。在文中，写危机日记的活动被认为是一种自然外化内在决策的方式。通过对论证采用语用辩证法，文本试图将危机日记写作刻画为一种论证活动类型。危机日记写作的论证特征包括确定制度点和实施类型，以及区分批判性讨论四个阶段的经验对应物。为了说明，本文从安妮·弗兰克的日记中提取了例子。