According to the argument scheme approach, to evaluate a given scheme-saturating instance completely does entail asking all critical questions (CQs) relevant to it. Although this is a central task for argumentation theorists, the field currently lacks a method for providing a complete argument evaluation. Approaching this task at the meta-level, we combine a logical with a substantive approach to the argument schemes by starting from Toulmin’s schema: ‘data, warrant, so claim’. For the yet more general schema: ‘premise(s); if premise(s), then conclusion; so conclusion’, we forward a meta-level CQ-list that is arguably both complete and applicable. This list should inform ongoing theoretical efforts at generating appropriate object-level CQs for specific argument schemes.

中文翻译：

---

方案、关键问题和完整的论证评估

根据论证方案方法，要完全评估给定的方案饱和实例确实需要询问与其相关的所有关键问题 (CQ)。尽管这是论证理论家的核心任务，但该领域目前缺乏提供完整论证评估的方法。在元级别处理此任务，我们从 Toulmin 的模式开始，将逻辑与实质性方法结合到论证方案中：“数据，保证，所以声明”。对于更一般的模式：'前提(s); 如果是前提，则结论；所以结论'，我们转发了一个可以说是完整和适用的元级 CQ 列表。该列表应告知正在进行的为特定论证方案生成适当的对象级 CQ 的理论工作。