ABSTRACT

The Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) model presently serves as a blueprint for both test development and a taxonomy for clinical interpretation of modern tests of cognitive ability. Accordingly, the trend among test publishers has been toward creating tests that provide users with an ever-increasing array of scores that comport with CHC. However, an accumulating body of independent research on modern intelligence tests has questioned many instruments’ alignment with the CHC model. To shed potential insight on these discrepancies, we review the developmental history of CHC and its numerous modifications from 1997 to the present. Next, we identify and discuss several potential limitations in the CHC literature that may be responsible for this discrepancy. Finally, we encourage clinicians to consider the extant evidence currently available for engaging in CHC-inspired assessment applications (e.g., XBA, PSW).

摘要

Cattell-Horn-Carroll（CHC）模型目前可作为测试开发的蓝图，也可作为现代解释认知能力测试的临床解释的分类法。因此，测试发布者之间的趋势已趋向于创建为用户提供与CHC相称的分数不断增加的测试。但是，有关现代智能测试的独立研究的不断积累，对许多仪器与CHC模型的一致性提出了质疑。为了揭示这些差异的潜在见解，我们回顾了CHC的发展历史及其从1997年至今的众多修改。接下来，我们在CHC文献中确定并讨论了可能导致这种差异的几个潜在限制。最后，