当前位置: X-MOL 学术American Business Law Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Workplace Information-Forcing: Constitutionality and Effectiveness
American Business Law Journal ( IF 1.743 ) Pub Date : 2016-07-28 , DOI: 10.1111/ablj.12083
Charlotte S. Alexander

“Know-your-rights” posters are ubiquitous in the American workplace, as employers are required by statute or regulation to display numerous notices about workers’ rights on the job. These posters were relatively uncontroversial until a recent set of lawsuits by employer groups attempted, on statutory and constitutional grounds, to block rules that would require notices about workers’ rights to form a union and bargain collectively. The lawsuits have produced mixed results in the courts. Using these recent cases, as well as the few prior cases that challenged other notice posting rules, this article addresses the constitutionality of workplace notice posting requirements. It then examines the effectiveness of notice posting rules, considering how such rules might best be structured to accomplish their first-order goals of informing workers about their rights and their second-order goals of spurring enforcement action to improve the conditions of work.

中文翻译:

工作场所信息强制:合宪性和有效性

在美国的工作场所中,“知道您的权利”的标语无处不在,因为法律或法规要求雇主在工作中显示许多有关工人权利的通知。这些招贴相对没有争议,直到最近雇主团体提起的一系列诉讼以法律和宪法为由试图阻止那些需要通知工人权利以组成工会和集体谈判的规则。诉讼在法院产生了不同的结果。本文使用这些最新案例以及对其他通知发布规则提出质疑的一些先前案例,解决了工作场所通知发布要求的合宪性问题。然后检查通知发布规则的有效性,
更新日期:2016-07-28
down
wechat
bug