The relationship between trauma and memory disorders is not an essential one; in fact, its origins can be traced back to the 1890s, to the works of Janet and Freud. In this article, we focus on two brief but fundamental periods in the works of both of these authors (1892-1895 and 1913-1914). Against most contemporary literature on the subject, we argue that Freud’s works gave much more importance than Janet’s to the relationship between trauma, memory, and pathology. Furthermore, we reconstruct two essential parts of their debate: the discussion about the relevance of hereditary and accidental factors and the one about the function of memory within the framework of treatment. As bibliographic sources, we use theoretical and clinical works—allowing for a better appreciation of the relationship between trauma and memory in both authors’ theories and practices.

中文翻译：

---

重温珍妮特与弗洛伊德之间的辩论：创伤与记忆（1892-1895/1913-1914）

创伤和记忆障碍之间的关系不是必要的；事实上，它的起源可以追溯到 1890 年代，珍妮特和弗洛伊德的作品。在本文中，我们将重点关注这两位作者（1892-1895 和 1913-1914）作品中的两个简短但基本的时期。与大多数关于这一主题的当代文献相比，我们认为弗洛伊德的作品比珍妮特的作品更重视创伤、记忆和病理学之间的关系。此外，我们重构了他们辩论的两个基本部分：关于遗传和偶然因素的相关性的讨论，以及关于治疗框架内记忆功能的讨论。作为书目来源，