dition depicts “men of science” as permeators of the notion of female anatomical “perfectibility.” Nurka guides the reader on a journey that begins with Hippocrates’ and Galen’s early notions of female anatomy, which essentially depicted female anatomy as identical to male anatomy, but internally placed; she extends the history through 21st century medical consultations for cosmetic genital surgery. Along the way, our tour includes changes in nomenclature, details of invasive observational methods, and the emergence of treatments for the “inferior,” at times described as “ugly,” hypertrophic labia. A male-centric, Eurocentric bias permeates much of this history, including disturbing photographs from the medical tome Woman: An Historical, Gynaecological and Anthropological Compendium by Plos, Bartels, and Bartels, first published in 1885, and updated through 1935, with a final abridged publication in 1965! Nurka explains that

中文翻译：

---

书评：后女性主义与健康：批判心理学和媒体观点

dition 将“科学家”描述为女性解剖学“完美性”概念的渗透者。努尔卡引导读者踏上一段旅程，从希波克拉底和盖伦的早期女性解剖学概念开始，这些概念本质上将女性解剖学描述为与男性解剖学相同，但在内部放置；她通过 21 世纪的生殖器整容手术医疗咨询来扩展历史。在此过程中，我们的旅行包括命名法的变化、侵入性观察方法的细节以及针对“劣质”（有时被称为“丑陋”、肥大阴唇）的治疗方法的出现。以男性为中心、以欧洲为中心的偏见贯穿了这段历史的大部分内容，其中包括 Plos、Bartels 和 Bartels 于 1885 年首次出版的医学巨著《女人：历史、妇科和人类学纲要》中令人不安的照片，并更新到 1935 年，并于 1965 年最终删节出版！努尔卡解释说