This study examined whether taking advice is influenced by regulatory fit and whether this effect is reduced or disappears within certain attribution conditions during vocational decision making. Experiment 1 created a vocational decision setting to compare differences in decision makers’ weight of advice (WOA) between ‘eager strategy’ and ‘vigilant strategy’ advice conditions. Results showed no significant main effect of regulatory orientation or advice strategy, but there was a significant interaction. The WOA value, with fit between regulatory focus and advice strategy, was higher than with a fit violation. Experiment 2 examined whether the regulatory fit effect is reduced or disappears within attribution conditions during vocational decision making. Results showed job seekers more easily take others’ advice under the fit condition, and a significant interaction existed between regulatory fit and attribution. Thus, attribution could reduce the influence of the regulatory fit effect. Implications for vocational consultants, job seekers, and advisors are also discussed.

中文翻译：

---

为职业决策提供建议：法规适应效应

这项研究调查了在职业决策过程中，服从建议是否受到法规适应的影响，以及这种影响在特定归因条件下是否减小或消失。实验1创建了一个职业决策设置，以比较“急切策略”和“警惕策略”建议条件之间决策者的建议权重（WOA）的差异。结果显示，监管取向或建议策略没有重大的主要影响，但存在显着的相互作用。与监管重点和建议策略相适应的WOA值高于违反合规性。实验2检验了在职业决策过程中，归因条件下调节适应效果是否减小或消失。结果显示，求职者在合适的条件下更容易接受他人的建议，监管契合度和归因之间存在显着的相互作用。因此，归因可以减少监管适应效应的影响。还讨论了对职业顾问，求职者和顾问的影响。