This study compared the Stepwise Interview, Cognitive Interview, and Reality Interview in detecting deception with inmates. The dependent measures were the amount of unique details provided during the free narrative and mnemonics and the number of words provided during the free narrative and mnemonics of each interview. The Stepwise Interview generated 58.3% accuracy, the Cognitive Interview generated 70.0% accuracy, and the Reality Interview generated 93.3% accuracy. The different tasks of these interviews increased the differences between honest and deceptive statements and therefore, increased the accuracy in detection of deception. Differential recall enhancement is used to explain the findings.

中文翻译：

---

比较不同调查性访谈技术在产生差异回想度增强和检测欺骗方面的作用

这项研究比较了逐步面试，认知面试和现实面试在发现与囚犯的欺骗中的作用。依赖的度量标准是在自由叙述和助记符期间提供的独特细节的数量，以及每次采访在自由叙述和助记符期间提供的单词数。逐步访谈产生58.3％的准确性，认知访谈产生70.0％的准确性，现实访谈产生93.3％的准确性。这些访谈的不同任务增加了诚实和欺骗性陈述之间的差异，因此，提高了欺骗检测的准确性。使用差异召回增强来解释发现。