当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Structural Validity of the Social Problem–Solving Inventory-Revised Short Form: Application to Brooding and Reflection
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy ( IF 0.813 ) Pub Date : 2018-10-01 , DOI: 10.1891/0889-8391.32.4.285
Emily A. P. Haigh , Victoria Quiñones , Michael T. Moore

Research on social problem-solving ability or the cognitive-behavioral processes used to find successful solutions to everyday problems has been advanced by the availability of easy-to-administer self-report measures. The goal of the current study is twofold: (a) validate the factor structure of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory–Revised: Short Form (SPSI-R:S) and (b) examine the relationship between depressive rumination subtypes and dimensions of social problem solving. An initial confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in Sample 1 revealed poor model fit. An exploratory factor analysis revealed that several items cross-loaded on more than one factor. These items were removed and a subsequent CFA demonstrated adequate model. The revised model was validated in a second sample and convergent and divergent validity were examined. Brooding was related to more maladaptive problem-solving ability while reflection was generally associated with a more adaptive problem-solving style. No gender differences were found.

中文翻译:

解决社会问题的库存修订版简短格式的结构有效性:在思考和反思中的应用

通过易于执行的自我报告措施,对用于解决日常问题的成功解决方案的社会问题解决能力或认知行为过程的研究得到了发展。本研究的目标是双重的:(a)验证修订后的社会解决问题清单的因素结构:简短形式(SPSI-R:S),以及(b)检验抑郁性反刍亚型与社会维度之间的关系。解决问题。样本1中的初始验证性因子分析(CFA)显示模型拟合差。探索性因素分析显示,多个项目在一个以上的因素上交叉装载。删除了这些项目,随后的CFA证明了足够的模型。在第二个样本中验证了修订后的模型,并检验了收敛性和发散性有效性。育儿与更适应不良的问题解决能力有关,而反思通常与更适应性的解决问题风格有关。未发现性别差异。
更新日期:2018-10-01
down
wechat
bug