当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Career Assessment › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Operationalize Interest Congruence: A Comparative Examination of Four Approaches
Journal of Career Assessment ( IF 3.500 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-09 , DOI: 10.1177/1069072720909825
Hui Xu 1 , Huaying Li 1
Affiliation  

Although interest congruence is a cornerstone of career counseling, little is known about the relative importance of different operationalization approaches to interest congruence (i.e., how to calculate interest congruence). Using a sample of U.S. employees (n = 303), the current study comparatively examined four profile-based conceptual congruence approaches, namely Euclidean distance, angular agreement, profile deviance, and profile correlation, in terms of their predictions for job and life satisfaction, turnover intention, and perceived person–job fit. The results found that profile correlation demonstrated complete dominance (i.e., ubiquitously stronger predictive utility) over the other three congruence indices in predicting all four career outcomes. Therefore, the current study portrays profile correlation as a preferred operationalization approach to interest congruence and offers rich implications for congruence research and practice.

中文翻译:

可操作的利益一致性:四种方法的比较检验

尽管利益一致性是职业咨询的基石,但对于利益一致性的不同操作方法(即,如何计算利益一致性)的相对重要性知之甚少。本研究使用美国雇员(n = 303)的样本,比较了四种基于轮廓的概念一致性方法,即欧氏距离,角度一致性,轮廓偏差和轮廓相关性,以预测他们的工作和生活满意度,离职意向和感知的人与工作适合度。结果发现,在预测所有四个职业结局时,个人资料相关性显示出在其他三个一致性指标上的绝对优势(即普遍的较强的预测效用)。因此,
更新日期:2020-03-09
down
wechat
bug