This research investigated the congruence between the ideologies of political parties and the ideological preferences (N = 1515), moral intuitions (N = 1048), and political values and worldviews (N = 1345) of diverse samples of Swedish adults who voted or intended to vote for the parties. Logistic regression analyses yielded support for a series of hypotheses about variations in ideology beyond the left–right division. With respect to social ideology, resistance to change and binding moral intuitions predicted stronger preference for a social democratic (vs. progressive) party on the left and weaker preference for a social liberal (vs. social conservative or liberal‐conservative) party on the right. With respect to political values and broader worldviews, normativism and low acceptance of immigrants predicted the strongest preference for a nationalist party, while environmentalism predicted the strongest preference for a green party. The effects were generally strong and robust when we controlled for left–right self‐placements, economic ideology, and demographic characteristics. These results show that personality variation in the ideological domain is not reducible to the simplistic contrast between ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives’, which ignores differences between progressive and non‐progressive leftists, economic and green progressives, social liberal and conservative rightists, and nationalist and non‐nationalist conservatives.

中文翻译：

---

超越“自由主义者”和“保守主义者”：意识形态，道德直觉和瑞典选民的世界观的复杂性

这项研究调查了政党意识形态与意识形态偏好（N  = 1515），道德直觉（N  = 1048）以及政治价值观和世界观（N = 1345）瑞典成年人的各种样本，他们曾投票或打算为政党投票。Logistic回归分析为一系列关于意识形态变化的假设提供了支持，这些假设超出了左右区分。关于社会意识形态，对变革的抵抗和具有约束力的道德直觉预示着，左派对社会民主党（相对于进步党）的偏好会增强，右派对社会自由党（与社会保守派或保守派保守党）的偏好会减弱。 。关于政治价值和更广阔的世界观，规范主义和对移民的低接受程度预示着对民族主义政党的强烈偏好，而环保主义则预示了对绿党的强烈偏好。当我们控制左右自我放置时，效果通常很强且很稳健，经济意识形态和人口特征。这些结果表明，意识形态领域的人格差异无法归结为“自由主义者”和“保守主义者”之间的简单对比，后者忽略了进步左派和非进步左派，经济和绿色进步主义者，社会自由主义者和保守右派以及民族主义者之间的差异。和非民族主义的保守派。