ABSTRACT Forests are under increasing pressure with increasing risk of conflicts between stakeholder groups with different interests in sustainable forest management (SFM). This study investigated the different dimensions of conflict as perceived by private forest owners and other stakeholders, and the likely impact of these pressures on SFM in a southern Swedish context. Data were collected through a mixed methods approach using qualitative in-depth individual semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and a quantitative survey (n = 6–161), with questions on present and past conflicts, actors, drivers, acting, management and solutions. Stakeholders felt that in the past the conflicts were more about technical dimensions of forestry practice, and today more about the political and cultural dimensions of forestry issues. The most frequently mentioned reason for forest conflict was forest protection, especially woodland key habitats. In all conflicts, forest owners emphasised the importance of knowledge, responsibility and emotions. Other stakeholders did too, but with emotions less emphasised. In managing conflict, meetings, adaptation and education were stressed by stakeholders. Dialogue arenas on different levels are needed for all stakeholders. Governing bodies also need to realise the implication different approaches and strategies have on forest owners management.

中文翻译：

---

利益相关者对瑞典南部林业冲突的看法、管理和影响

摘要 随着在可持续森林管理 (SFM) 中具有不同利益的利益相关者群体之间发生冲突的风险不断增加，森林面临越来越大的压力。本研究调查了私人森林所有者和其他利益相关者所感知的冲突的不同维度，以及这些压力对瑞典南部环境中可持续森林管理的可能影响。通过混合方法收集数据，使用定性深入的个人半结构化访谈、焦点小组讨论和定量调查（n = 6-161），问题涉及当前和过去的冲突、参与者、驱动因素、表演、管理和解决方案。利益相关者认为，过去的冲突更多是关于林业实践的技术层面，而今天更多的是关于林业问题的政治和文化层面。森林冲突最常被提及的原因是森林保护，尤其是林地关键栖息地。在所有冲突中，森林所有者都强调知识、责任和情感的重要性。其他利益相关者也这样做了，但不太强调情感。在管理冲突时，利益相关者强调会议、适应和教育。所有利益相关者都需要不同级别的对话舞台。管理机构还需要意识到不同方法和策略对森林所有者管理的影响。利益攸关方强调了适应和教育。所有利益相关者都需要不同级别的对话舞台。管理机构还需要意识到不同方法和策略对森林所有者管理的影响。利益攸关方强调了适应和教育。所有利益相关者都需要不同级别的对话舞台。管理机构还需要意识到不同方法和策略对森林所有者管理的影响。