ABSTRACT

In their article, Doerig et al suggest a set of criteria for evaluating theories of consciousness. Naturally, their criteria are situated in their own particular perspective on consciousness science, which we have critiqued in the past. Their first criterion is likely to be the one that is most productive and least contentious: if the field can agree to a family of paradigm cases for consciousness, this would be an important endeavor for the field.

中文翻译：

---

功能主义者的合理标准；现象学视角下的稀缺标准

摘要

在他们的文章中，Doerig 等人提出了一套评估意识理论的标准。自然地，他们的标准位于他们自己对意识科学的特定观点中，我们过去曾对此进行过批评。他们的第一个标准可能是最有成效且争议最少的标准：如果该领域能够同意一系列关于意识的范式案例，那么这将是该领域的一项重要努力。