当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Futures Research › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Participatory agenda setting as a process — of people, ambassadors and translation: a case study of participatory agenda setting in rural areas
European Journal of Futures Research ( IF 3.625 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-23 , DOI: 10.1186/s40309-020-00165-w
Fabian Schroth , Hannah Glatte , Simone Kaiser , Marie Heidingsfelder

This paper presents a case study of a participatory agenda setting process in rural areas, with the aim of establishing at which points participation was achieved and via which channels and processes the results of said participation were introduced into local and overarching policy agendas. We argue that participatory agenda setting involves two central challenges, namely the development of dialogue formats and procedures that enable members of the public to take part in the process, and the selection and use of the appropriate channels for conveying their input to the relevant decision-makers. Agenda setting is thus a process during which concepts and issues are collaboratively uncovered or developed and then integrated, via networks, into policy and research strategy. Accordingly, this process encompasses the actors involved in the agenda setting process, the procedures that make participation possible, and the channels via which the results are then transferred.

中文翻译:

作为过程的参与式议程设置——人、大使和翻译:农村地区参与式议程设置的案例研究

本文介绍了农村地区参与式议程设置过程的案例研究,目的是确定在哪些点上实现了参与,以及通过哪些渠道和过程将所述参与的结果引入地方和总体政策议程。我们认为,参与式议程设置涉及两个主要挑战,即制定使公众成员能够参与该过程的对话形式和程序,以及选择和使用适当的渠道将他们的意见传达给相关决策-制造商。因此,议程设置是一个过程,在此过程中,概念和问题被协作发现或发展,然后通过网络整合到政策和研究战略中。因此,
更新日期:2020-07-23
down
wechat
bug